Skip to main content

...And the Horse He Rode in On - and other books by James Carville (who tried to warn us)

Two things. 

1) James Carville is hilarious. There's just something about his smile and the sound of his voice. 

2) My husband's bookshelf is amazing. (There's something about his smile and voice, too. Swoon.)

Book I Haven't Read Yet: ...And the Horse He Rode in On: The People v. Kenneth Starr (1998)

Why I Haven't Read it: As you know, the titles on my shelf are very heavy on women's fiction, poetry, plays, and the textbooks from my feminist and critical theory college courses. My non-fiction titles are somewhere between lacking and non-existent. 

To Be Honest: I also want to plug Carville's other books, particularly...

40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation (2009)

It's the Middle Class, Stupid! (2012)

We're Still Right - And They're Still Wrong (2016)

But since I have ...And the Horse in front of me, we'll stay focused on this one title.

Should You Read It?  So, as I just learned 20 minutes ago, Ken Starr died just a couple of months ago due to complications related to surgery. While I generally hate to speak ill of the dead (Rush Limbaugh not withstanding) I do think the actions of Kenneth Starr during the Clinton impeachment deserve remembrance, a memorial candle lit, but one in which we hope does not see some burning down our republic. 

Carville's front flap is simply his own quote:

"Kenneth Starr's investigation represents a historic and unconscionable violation of justice fueled by a ring wing hell-bent on overturning the American people's election - and re-election - of Bill Clinton."

Again, this was 1998. 

Spooky familiar, eh?

I can't help but quote Carville again, as he quoted himself again on the page prior to the contents and his introduction. If you didn't know this was written in the late 1990's, you could read it and feel the same eerie chill (or worse) that permeates our icy political climate today.

"The President's attackers are a motley band, consisting primarily of perjuring partisan politicians, strumpets, hags, bitter old segregationists, hired guns for cigarette companies, felons, judges who trade favors for jobs, bitter, defeated, pathetic former political rivals, Hillary-hating misogynists, wacko billionaires, gay-bashers, hate radio hucksters, mother-subpoenaing prosecutors, and mother-suing nutcases, all feeding and endless line of lies and half-truths to jealous journalists, envious editorialists, curmudgeonly columnists, and cranky commentators more concerned with their own self-importance and trashing the good name of a great President than the truth."*

*bolded selections are my own.


In closing, it might be too painful to read, considering in the 24 years since the publication of this book, things have only gotten worse, not better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Closing Arguments, Trial 3. The Defense: Closing the Case of Adnan Syed v Alice LaCour and Brett Talley

  Would Hae Have Liked Pineapple on Pizza? If it Pleases the Court... Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I want to start by thanking you for your time. It is no small task to put your lives on hold and focus in on the details and particulars and specifics of this case, and it may be a struggle to focus when you have to think about what you're missing at home. Your civil duty - and your willingness to fulfill it - does NOT go unnoticed. I mentioned "time." It's a relative, term, right? I had to wait in line at the post office for 15 minutes. I waited for the checkout gal at Wal-Mart for 20, because they didn't have enough lanes open. I don't know about you, but I try to be patient. Sometimes I fail to wait gracefully, but I really do try.  So. Look at Adnan. For over TWENTY-THREE YEARS he has been waiting... patiently. 23 years ago, I was about the same age as Adnan. I graduated high school in the spring of 1999, just like he did - or would have - had he not bee

20 Points in a Basic Story in the Botched Case Against Adnan Syed: I Must Be Insane as that's 5x More than any Other Basic Story Presentation I've Ever Seen

  Basic Story With 20 Points:  Could Adnan be Innocent? "It's not a cop-out; it's case law." ~Bob Ruff, host, Truth and Justice Pod   1 Adnan was the main suspect - Hae's family passed that along to Officer Adcock on the afternoon she disappeared. Originally, they suspected she might be with Don, even though she had to work at 6pm and had never once NOT brought her cousin home. Does anyone know how old the second cousin is? Two cousins lived with Hae. And Officer Adcock's Supplemental Report dated 1/13/99 states that Mr. Lee advises that she "did not pick up his two cousins from school.") Did they go to the same school, these cousins? Another question that could be explored is why Hae's uncle is the only immediately family member who doesn't live with Hae.  Another pain point for me - I'm confused as to why the cousins did not live with their dad, Hae's uncle... but look. Every family has different dynamics. I mean, I gues

Not The Nisha Call: Other Things to Consider in the Case of Adnan Syed

"If there is anything about my case, man - I want to know... I want to test it... There's nothing about my case that that I'm afraid of." - Adnan Syed Serial, Episode 12: What We Knew Instead of focusing on a flower and Jay's Changing Stories, Consider This: A) The policemen handling the Missing Persons Investigation did sloppy and lazy work. They back dated reports and failed to interview multiple people  thoroughly enough. B) The police did not interview the family robustly enough to understand what else might have been going on in Hae's life. They, to my knowledge, did not find a translator and instead relied on the guidance of her younger brother. C) A computer, a floppy disk containing electronic diary entries were noted and later went "missing"  D) Hae's email and AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) accounts were never researched thoroughly, and her online activity is relatively unknown, outside of her newly updated "away message" which s