So yesterday we learned that when Turtleboy first heard the news story about John O'Keefe's death, he gasp! - thought Karen was guilty of running over him. (And as we discussed, Gretchen doesn't mention that he - along with everyone else who watched or read the news - was told it was open and shut because of ring camera video of the incident.)
No, instead, in her next paragraph, Gretchen says that Aidan thought Karen was guilty BEFORE Read and her team started giving him access to info about the case to report for them. She does this by linking the two things together without providing insight into what OTHER SOURCES Turtleboy had access to between his "she's guilty, moving on" live stream on FEBRUARY 10,2022 and the time of his first CANTON COVERUP ARTICLE, April 18, 2023. These sources include: Steve Scanlon, a former cop who was a friend of John's, and the Boston Globe's October 3, 2022 (6 months earlier!) article by Travis Anderson and John K. Ellement, outlining the defense theory of dog bites, fist fights, a falsified time on the report about the SUV being towed from Dighton, and the cover up of the fact that the residence belonged to Brian Albert. Not to mention the 4/12/23 hearing in which these holes in the Commonwealth's case were argued to a frustrated Prosecutor and bench.
Voss is implying that Aidan's only knowledge of the defense theory came FROM the defense, which is patently false.
She takes a petty road when she insinuates the defense promises to make him a "star" and even an "award winning journalist" - as Aidan already self-identifies as that. Oh, and the "star" spotlight is going to come from a future shout out on Dateline.
Mkay, Gretch. I'm pretty sure Aidan's blog posts, You Tube Views, and X posts exceeded the viewership of one Dateline episode a LONG time ago. But you do you, girl.
Ahhh, now we get to the meat and potatoes. Voss says that with text, signal and phone calls, Read used Kearney to tell people about the alternative theory (and I'm actually shocked she used the word "alternative" here, rather than conspiracy... what a bone she's thrown Karen!)
So, Read used Kearney to publish details of the Alternative Theory with the actual audacity to hope that it would keep her case from ever going to trial.
Wait just a hot minute here.
A defendant in a MURDER trial... and indicted woman facing the REST of her NATURAL LIFE behind bars... didn't want the case against her TO GO TO TRIAL?
I mean, color me with blue paint surprised.
Wow. She didn't decide to plea (an episode for Matty McCabe) and she didn't want a trial. Is she allowed to want the charges against her to be dropped? Can that not go on one's Amazon Wish List?
I beg your goddamn pardon, Gretchen.
But Gretchen. For one, I thought reading court documents WAS investigate-y. For two, I THOUGHT THE DEFENSE HELD NATALIE AT GUN POINT AND MADE HER TELL HIM EVERYTHING DURING THE DAYS BETWEEN APRIL 12th and 18th?!
You @!$@!*# !##@^*
Let me take a deep breath here before I punch my laptop harder than Colin Albert punched John O'Keefe.
Gretchen re-caps Adian's first "Canton Coverup" post: Karen and her team say Brian Albert and Colin Albert beat up John, and Jen McCabe and investigators covered it up.
Voss says that "putting the blame on the 'witnesses' became a recurring feature" of the way Aidan Kearney reported on the case because Karen directed him/made him.
Wow, it seems like Aidan is the victim at this point.
Also I didn't know third-party culprits aren't allowed if they are called as witnesses in trials.
Comments